Ryzen 3 7320U vs Celeron T3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiencyno data35.14
Architecture codenameno dataMendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data8
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3100 599
Ryzen 3 7320U 8841
+1376%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron T3100 214
Ryzen 3 7320U 1157
+441%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron T3100 365
Ryzen 3 7320U 3613
+890%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2008 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 45 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 7320U has an age advantage of 14 years, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3100 and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3100
Celeron T3100
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 18 votes

Rate Celeron T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 664 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3100 or Ryzen 3 7320U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.