E1 Micro-6200T vs Celeron T3100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T3100
2008
35 Watt
0.38
E1 Micro-6200T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 3 Watt
0.38

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30153014
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.039.10
Architecture codenameno dataMullins (2014)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.4 GHz
L2 cacheno data1024 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt3.95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T3100 0.38
E1 Micro-6200T 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3100 599
E1 Micro-6200T 600
+0.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2008 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 3 Watt

E1 Micro-6200T has an age advantage of 5 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3100 and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3100
Celeron T3100
AMD E1 Micro-6200T
E1 Micro-6200T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 18 votes

Rate Celeron T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 29 votes

Rate E1 Micro-6200T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3100 or E1 Micro-6200T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.