Ryzen 9 5950X vs Celeron T1700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T1700
2008
35 Watt
0.67
Ryzen 9 5950X
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
28.70
+4184%

Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron T1700 by a whopping 4184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T1700 and Ryzen 9 5950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2751160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.75
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency1.8125.85
Architecture codenameno dataVermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)5 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron T1700 and Ryzen 9 5950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threadsno data32
Base clock speed1.83 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.9 GHz
Multiplierno data34
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache64 MB
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno dataCPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T1700 and Ryzen 9 5950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1700 and Ryzen 9 5950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron T1700 and Ryzen 9 5950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1700 and Ryzen 9 5950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T1700 and Ryzen 9 5950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T1700 and Ryzen 9 5950X.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T1700 0.67
Ryzen 9 5950X 28.70
+4184%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T1700 1058
Ryzen 9 5950X 45593
+4209%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 28.70
Recency 1 October 2008 5 November 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 105 Watt

Celeron T1700 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 5950X, on the other hand, has a 4183.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 5950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T1700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron T1700 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 5950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1700 and Ryzen 9 5950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T1700
Celeron T1700
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 9 5950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron T1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2579 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T1700 or Ryzen 9 5950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.