Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Celeron T1600

Place in the ranking	3067	562
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	no data	AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency	0.95	84.54
Architecture codename	no data	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date	1 October 2008 (16 years ago)	23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	no data	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	no data	12
Base clock speed	1.66 GHz	3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	no data	4.9 GHz
L1 cache	no data	384 KB
L2 cache	no data	6 MB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	16 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	4 nm
Die size	no data	178 mm²
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	100 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
VID voltage range	1.075V-1.175V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T1600 0.35

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U 13.40
+3729%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T1600 551

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U 21287
+3763%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.35	13.40
Recency	1 October 2008	23 May 2023
Chip lithography	65 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U has a 3728.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T1600 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.