Ryzen 5 4600G vs Celeron SU2300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated764
Place by popularitynot in top-10026
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiencyno data14.73
Architecture codenameno dataRenoir (2020−2023)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cacheno data3 MB
L3 cache1 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956AM4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron SU2300 482
Ryzen 5 4600G 16072
+3234%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron SU2300 160
Ryzen 5 4600G 1582
+889%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron SU2300 278
Ryzen 5 4600G 6135
+2107%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 21 July 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron SU2300 has 550% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 4600G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron SU2300 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 4600G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 4600G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron SU2300
Celeron SU2300
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Ryzen 5 4600G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2693 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron SU2300 or Ryzen 5 4600G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.