Processor N50 vs Celeron SU2300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron SU2300
2009
10 Watt
0.30
Processor N50
2023
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.74
+480%

Processor N50 outperforms Celeron SU2300 by a whopping 480% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron SU2300 and Processor N50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31122038
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency2.8427.43
Architecture codenameno dataAlder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron SU2300 and Processor N50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
L3 cache1 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron SU2300 and Processor N50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron SU2300 and Processor N50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron SU2300 and Processor N50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron SU2300 and Processor N50 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron SU2300 and Processor N50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron SU2300 and Processor N50.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 1.74
Recency 1 July 2009 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N50 has a 480% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Processor N50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron SU2300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron SU2300 and Processor N50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron SU2300
Celeron SU2300
Intel Processor N50
Processor N50

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Processor N50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron SU2300 or Processor N50, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.