Apple M1 Max vs Celeron P1053
Primary details
Comparing Celeron P1053 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 525 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Jasper Forest (2010) | no data |
| Release date | 12 February 2010 (14 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron P1053 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron P1053 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1366 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron P1053 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron P1053 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron P1053 and Apple M1 Max.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 February 2010 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Celeron P1053 has 6766.7% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron P1053 and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron P1053 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron P1053 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
