Processor N200 vs Celeron N5095A
Aggregate performance score
Celeron N5095A outperforms Processor N200 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N5095A and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1738 | 2122 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
Power efficiency | 16.35 | 24.62 |
Architecture codename | Jasper Lake (2021) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 1 July 2021 (3 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $193 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N5095A and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N5095A and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | BGA1338 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095A and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | - | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N5095A and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | - | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095A and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095A and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 16 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095A and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095A and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N5095A and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095A and Processor N200.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | 9 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 14 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.59 | 1.56 |
Integrated graphics card | 5.58 | 3.29 |
Recency | 1 July 2021 | 3 January 2023 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron N5095A has a 66% higher aggregate performance score, and 69.6% faster integrated GPU.
Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 150% lower power consumption.
The Celeron N5095A is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron N5095A is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095A and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.