Ryzen 5 6600H vs Celeron N5095

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.62
Ryzen 5 6600H
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
12.00
+358%

Ryzen 5 6600H outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1728653
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency16.2224.77
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FP7
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsAMD Radeon 660M
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes820
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5095 2.62
Ryzen 5 6600H 12.00
+358%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5095 4080
Ryzen 5 6600H 18702
+358%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N5095 364
Ryzen 5 6600H 1737
+377%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N5095 106
Ryzen 5 6600H 236
+123%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N5095 2028
Ryzen 5 6600H 7729
+281%

Blender(-)

Celeron N5095 1547
+428%
Ryzen 5 6600H 293

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N5095 651
Ryzen 5 6600H 1474
+127%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N5095 3100
Ryzen 5 6600H 5553
+79.1%

7-Zip

Celeron N5095 11013
Ryzen 5 6600H 47836
+334%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N5095 125
Ryzen 5 6600H 244
+94.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.62 12.00
Integrated graphics card 5.57 16.29
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron N5095 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 6600H, on the other hand, has a 358% higher aggregate performance score, 192.5% faster integrated GPU, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 6600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5095 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 6600H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and Ryzen 5 6600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
Ryzen 5 6600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1439 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 792 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 6600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or Ryzen 5 6600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.