i9-13900H vs Celeron N4500

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4500
2021
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.24
Core i9-13900H
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
18.07
+1357%

Core i9-13900H outperforms Celeron N4500 by a whopping 1357% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2303332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Raptor Lake-H
Power efficiency19.5638.00
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Raptor Lake-H (2023)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$617

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.5 GHz
Execution Units1696

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes88
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4500 1.24
i9-13900H 18.07
+1357%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4500 1964
i9-13900H 28701
+1361%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N4500 2053
i9-13900H 14893
+625%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N4500 50.2
i9-13900H 3.52
+1326%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N4500 2
i9-13900H 28
+1256%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N4500 171
i9-13900H 2667
+1459%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N4500 82
i9-13900H 279
+240%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron N4500 1.04
i9-13900H 2.98
+187%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Celeron N4500 1.1
i9-13900H 13.3
+1109%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Celeron N4500 12
i9-13900H 114
+848%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Celeron N4500 61
i9-13900H 298
+391%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Celeron N4500 1076
i9-13900H 6800
+532%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N4500 1018
i9-13900H 12890
+1166%

Blender(-)

Celeron N4500 4249
+2068%
i9-13900H 196

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N4500 594
i9-13900H 1955
+229%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N4500 2853
i9-13900H 6276
+120%

7-Zip

Celeron N4500 5394
i9-13900H 70166
+1201%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N4500 95
i9-13900H 316
+234%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 18.07
Recency 11 January 2021 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 20
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron N4500 has 650% lower power consumption.

i9-13900H, on the other hand, has a 1357.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 600% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

The Core i9-13900H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4500 and Core i9-13900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4500
Celeron N4500
Intel Core i9-13900H
Core i9-13900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 731 vote

Rate Celeron N4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 522 votes

Rate Core i9-13900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4500 or Core i9-13900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.