Ultra 7 256V vs Celeron N4500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4500
2021
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.24
Core Ultra 7 256V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.57
+914%

Core Ultra 7 256V outperforms Celeron N4500 by a whopping 914% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2317618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency19.5569.93
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1338FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsIntel Arc Graphics 140V
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.95 GHz
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes84
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4500 1.24
Ultra 7 256V 12.57
+914%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4500 1965
Ultra 7 256V 19971
+916%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N4500 1018
Ultra 7 256V 9460
+829%

Blender(-)

Celeron N4500 4249
+1211%
Ultra 7 256V 324

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N4500 594
Ultra 7 256V 1972
+232%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N4500 2853
Ultra 7 256V 5672
+98.8%

7-Zip

Celeron N4500 5394
Ultra 7 256V 35964
+567%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N4500 95
Ultra 7 256V 306
+223%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Celeron N4500 91
Ultra 7 256V 285
+213%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Celeron N4500 662
Ultra 7 256V 10952
+1554%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Celeron N4500 457
Ultra 7 256V 2778
+508%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 12.57
Integrated graphics card 5.58 13.29
Recency 11 January 2021 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron N4500 has 183.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 256V, on the other hand, has a 913.7% higher aggregate performance score, 138.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 256V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4500 and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4500
Celeron N4500
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 744 votes

Rate Celeron N4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4500 or Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.