i3-3250 vs Celeron N4100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4100
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.58
+0.6%
Core i3-3250
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.57

Celeron N4100 outperforms Core i3-3250 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21172120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.15
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency24.462.65
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)9 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$138

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data94 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 deg Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+-
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics 2500
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency700 MHz1.05 GHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4100 1.58
+0.6%
i3-3250 1.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4100 2457
+0.6%
i3-3250 2442

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N4100 309
i3-3250 583
+88.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N4100 825
i3-3250 1189
+44.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.58 1.57
Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.69
Recency 11 December 2017 9 June 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 55 Watt

Celeron N4100 has a 0.6% higher aggregate performance score, 26.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 816.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250.

Be aware that Celeron N4100 is a notebook processor while Core i3-3250 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4100 and Core i3-3250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4100
Celeron N4100
Intel Core i3-3250
Core i3-3250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 430 votes

Rate Celeron N4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 198 votes

Rate Core i3-3250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4100 or Core i3-3250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.