i3-530 vs Celeron N4000C

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.89
Core i3-530
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
0.95
+6.7%

Core i3-530 outperforms Celeron N4000C by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25602520
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.14
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency14.031.23
Architecture codenameno dataClarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date1 April 2019 (5 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz0.93 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 deg C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.65V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
vPro--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16.38 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000C 0.89
i3-530 0.95
+6.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4000C 1406
i3-530 1502
+6.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.95
Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.77
Recency 1 April 2019 7 January 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 73 Watt

Celeron N4000C has 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1116.7% lower power consumption.

i3-530, on the other hand, has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530.

Be aware that Celeron N4000C is a notebook processor while Core i3-530 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000C and Core i3-530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000C
Celeron N4000C
Intel Core i3-530
Core i3-530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 37 votes

Rate Celeron N4000C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 448 votes

Rate Core i3-530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000C or Core i3-530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.