Celeron J1800 vs N4000C

Place in the ranking	2561	3055
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	13.98	3.43
Architecture codename	no data	Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date	1 April 2019 (5 years ago)	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$72

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	1.1 GHz	2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.6 GHz	2.58 GHz
L1 cache	no data	112 KB
L2 cache	no data	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 deg C	105 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1090	FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	-
vPro	-	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Smart Response	-	no data
PAE	no data	36 Bit
GPIO	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
FDI	no data	-
RST	no data	-

Security technologies

Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
MPX	+	-
Identity Protection	+	-
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s	DDR3
Maximum memory size	8 GB	8 GB
Max memory channels	2	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory	8 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	+
Graphics max frequency	650 MHz	792 MHz
Execution Units	12	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	2
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
MIPI-DSI	+	no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support

no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	6	4
USB revision	2.0/3.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	8	no data
Integrated LAN	-	no data
UART	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000C 0.88
+144%

Celeron J1800 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4000C 1414
+148%

Celeron J1800 571

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.88	0.36
Integrated graphics card	0.87	0.77
Recency	1 April 2019	1 November 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	10 Watt

Celeron N4000C has a 144.4% higher aggregate performance score, 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N4000C is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.