Atom C3958 vs Celeron N4000

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.93
Atom C3958
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 31 Watt
2.47
+166%

Atom C3958 outperforms Celeron N4000 by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25131750
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.53
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency14.677.54
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Multiplier1120
L1 cache112 KB896 KB
L2 cache4 MB16 MB
L3 cache4 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 deg C83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size8 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.03
Total number of SATA ports216
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports216
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN-4x10/2.5/1 GBE
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000 0.93
Atom C3958 2.47
+166%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4000 1472
Atom C3958 3929
+167%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 2.47
Recency 11 December 2017 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron N4000 has an age advantage of 3 months, and 416.7% lower power consumption.

Atom C3958, on the other hand, has a 165.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Atom C3958 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N4000 is a notebook processor while Atom C3958 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000 and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000
Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 899 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000 or Atom C3958, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.