EPYC 7373X vs Celeron N3350E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Architecture codenameno dataMilan-X (2022)
Release date1 July 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.05 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socketno dataSP3
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
Smart Idle-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes6128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2019 22 March 2022
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 240 Watt

Celeron N3350E has 3900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7373X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3350E is a notebook processor while EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350E and EPYC 7373X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350E
Celeron N3350E
AMD EPYC 7373X
EPYC 7373X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron N3350E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7373X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350E or EPYC 7373X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.