Xeon Silver 4214 vs Celeron N3350

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3350
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.70
Xeon Silver 4214
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
10.19
+1356%

Xeon Silver 4214 outperforms Celeron N3350 by a whopping 1356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2703757
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.01
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency11.0411.35
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24$694

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier1122
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache1 MB12 MB
L3 cache0 KB16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C77 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1296FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size8 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidthno data115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes648
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3350 0.70
Xeon Silver 4214 10.19
+1356%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3350 1107
Xeon Silver 4214 16190
+1363%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N3350 252
Xeon Silver 4214 1009
+300%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N3350 418
Xeon Silver 4214 6439
+1440%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 10.19
Recency 30 August 2016 2 April 2019
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 85 Watt

Celeron N3350 has 1316.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4214, on the other hand, has a 1355.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Xeon Silver 4214 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3350 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4214 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Xeon Silver 4214, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
Intel Xeon Silver 4214
Xeon Silver 4214

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 955 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4214 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or Xeon Silver 4214, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.