Xeon 6952P vs Celeron N3160

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2660not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency17.97no data
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB480 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA11707529
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency640 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes496
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2016 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron N3160 has 6566.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6952P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3160 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6952P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3160 and Xeon 6952P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3160
Celeron N3160
Intel Xeon 6952P
Xeon 6952P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 195 votes

Rate Celeron N3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 24 votes

Rate Xeon 6952P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3160 or Xeon 6952P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.