EPYC 7352 vs Celeron N3160

Place in the ranking	2651	196
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	10.82
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD EPYC
Power efficiency	17.65	15.41
Architecture codename	Braswell (2015−2016)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date	15 January 2016 (8 years ago)	7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$1,350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads	4	48
Base clock speed	1.6 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.24 GHz	3.2 GHz
Bus type	IDI	no data
Multiplier	no data	23
L1 cache	no data	1.5 MB
L2 cache	2 MB	12 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	no data	192 mm²
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	FCBGA1170	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Smart Response	-	no data
GPIO	+	no data
Smart Connect	-	no data
HD Audio	+	no data
RST	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Boot	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-
OS Guard	-	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
VT-i	-	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	8 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.763 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)	no data
Max video memory	8 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	640 MHz	no data
Execution Units	12	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	+	no data
OpenGL	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	no data
USB revision	2.0/3.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data
Integrated LAN	-	no data
UART	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3160 0.76

EPYC 7352 25.72
+3284%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3160 1187

EPYC 7352 40096
+3278%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.76	25.72
Recency	15 January 2016	7 August 2019
Physical cores	4	24
Threads	4	48
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	155 Watt

Celeron N3160 has 2483.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7352, on the other hand, has a 3284.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7352 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3160 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3160 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7352 is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3160 and EPYC 7352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.