Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Celeron N3150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron N2840 Celeron N3000 Celeron N3010 Celeron N3050 Celeron N3060 Celeron N3150 Celeron N3160 Celeron N3350 Celeron N3450 Celeron N4000 Celeron N4020 Celeron N4500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 FX-62 Athlon 64 LE-1620 Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE

Contents

Celeron N3150 Celeron N3150
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2651not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency11.83no data
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.08 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2 MB512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170AM2
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Seriesno data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency640 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3150 1192
+72.3%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 692

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N3150 164
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 195
+18.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N3150 499
+37.5%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 363

Pros & cons summary

Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 89 Watt

Celeron N3150 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1383.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3150 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3150 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron N3150
Celeron N3150
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron N3150 Celeron N3150
vs
A4-3300M A4 3300M
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+
vs
Athlon 64 2650e Athlon 64 2650e
Celeron N3150 Celeron N3150
vs
Pentium N3530 Pentium N3530
i7-3632QM Core i7 3632QM
vs
i7-4558U Core i7 4558U
Athlon II X4 640 Athlon II X4 640
vs
Pentium D 945 Pentium D 945
i5-4210H Core i5 4210H
vs
i5-2450M Core i5 2450M
Xeon E5-2640 Xeon E5 2640
vs
i9-12900K Core i9 12900K
i5-3330 Core i5 3330
vs
Core 2 Duo T5750 Core 2 Duo T5750
Athlon X2 7750 BE Athlon X2 7750 BE
vs
Phenom II X4 920 Phenom II X4 920
i7-6700 Core i7 6700
vs
Xeon E5-4610 Xeon E5 4610
Pentium G4400 Pentium G4400
vs
i7-9700KF Core i7 9700KF
Core 2 Duo E4500 Core 2 Duo E4500
vs
Ryzen 9 7900X Ryzen 9 7900X
Pentium D 925 Pentium D 925
vs
i3-6006U Core i3 6006U

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 58 votes

Rate Celeron N3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 190 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3150 or Athlon 64 X2 4000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.