Xeon w5-2545 vs Celeron N3010

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.44
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data11.83
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 January 2016 (8 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.04 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TB
Max memory channels24
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes464
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3010 605
Xeon w5-2545 41688
+6791%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2016 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 210 Watt

Celeron N3010 has 5150% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-2545, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3010 is a notebook processor while Xeon w5-2545 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3010 and Xeon w5-2545, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3010
Celeron N3010
Intel Xeon w5-2545
Xeon w5-2545

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 23 votes

Rate Celeron N3010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon w5-2545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3010 or Xeon w5-2545, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.