Celeron N2820 vs N3010

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3010
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.38
+18.8%
Celeron N2820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.32

Celeron N3010 outperforms Celeron N2820 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30123083
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency8.994.33
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date10 January 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.04 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz2.39 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-+
HD Audio+no data
RST--

Security technologies

Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency600 MHz756 MHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision2.0/3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports55
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3010 0.38
+18.8%
Celeron N2820 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3010 605
+19.8%
Celeron N2820 505

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N3010 182
Celeron N2820 198
+8.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N3010 328
Celeron N2820 343
+4.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 0.32
Recency 10 January 2016 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron N3010 has a 18.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 75% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N3010 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2820 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3010 and Celeron N2820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3010
Celeron N3010
Intel Celeron N2820
Celeron N2820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 24 votes

Rate Celeron N3010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 45 votes

Rate Celeron N2820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3010 or Celeron N2820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.