Celeron 6305 vs N3000
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2252 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Tiger Lake |
Power efficiency | no data | 8.27 |
Architecture codename | Braswell (2015−2016) | Tiger Lake-U (2020) |
Release date | 1 April 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.04 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.08 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Bus type | IDI | no data |
Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1449 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Smart Connect | - | no data |
HD Audio | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | - |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | no data | - |
OS Guard | - | + |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | + | + |
VT-i | - | no data |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Series | Intel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | + |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | + |
Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | 1.25 GHz |
Execution Units | 12 | 48 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | 4 |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680x4320@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | + | 12.1 |
OpenGL | + | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 April 2015 | 1 September 2020 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron N3000 has 275% lower power consumption.
Celeron 6305, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3000 and Celeron 6305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.