N100 vs Celeron N2940

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2940
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.66

N100 outperforms Celeron N2940 by a whopping 427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2940 and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27401536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency8.8954.66
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)no data
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2940 and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads44
Base clock speed1.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2940 and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2940 and N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+
Smart Connect+no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2940 and N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2940 and N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2940 and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency854 MHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2940 and N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N2940 and N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2940 and N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2940 and N100.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes49
USB revision3.0 and 2.02.0/3.2
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2940 0.66
N100 3.48
+427%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2940 1044
N100 5501
+427%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 3.48
Recency 22 May 2014 1 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

N100 has a 427.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2940 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2940 and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2940
Celeron N2940
Intel N100
N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 106 votes

Rate Celeron N2940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 181 vote

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2940 or N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.