Xeon D-2896TER vs Celeron N2930
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2771 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.65 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | no data |
| Release date | 23 February 2014 (10 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 30 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 110 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 32 |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 February 2014 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 20 |
| Threads | 4 | 40 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 110 Watt |
Celeron N2930 has 1471.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-2896TER, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron N2930 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2896TER is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2930 and Xeon D-2896TER, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
