Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) vs Celeron N2930

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2756not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency8.62no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)13 August 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.83 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data258 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170AM3
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W).

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2014 13 August 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 140 Watt

Celeron N2930 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2930 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2930 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2930
Celeron N2930
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W)
Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 56 votes

Rate Celeron N2930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 101 vote

Rate Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2930 or Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.