Ryzen 5 6600H vs Celeron N2920

Place in the ranking	2790	653
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency	8.11	24.77
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date	1 December 2013 (10 years ago)	January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2920 and Ryzen 5 6600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	4	12
Base clock speed	1.86 GHz	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	2 GHz	4.5 GHz
L1 cache	56K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	6 nm
Die size	no data	208 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	95 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2920 and Ryzen 5 6600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FP7
Power consumption (TDP)	7.5 Watt	45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2920 and Ryzen 5 6600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Smart Connect	+	no data
RST	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron N2920 and Ryzen 5 6600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2920 and Ryzen 5 6600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2920 and Ryzen 5 6600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	AMD Radeon 660M
Graphics max frequency	844 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2920 and Ryzen 5 6600H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2920 and Ryzen 5 6600H.

PCIe version	2.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	4	20
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2920 0.60

Ryzen 5 6600H 11.78
+1863%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2920 950

Ryzen 5 6600H 18704
+1869%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N2920 119

Ryzen 5 6600H 1737
+1366%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2920 33

Ryzen 5 6600H 236
+626%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.60	11.78
Physical cores	4	6
Threads	4	12
Chip lithography	22 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	45 Watt

Celeron N2920 has 542.9% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 6600H, on the other hand, has a 1863.3% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 6600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2920 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2920 and Ryzen 5 6600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.