Duo T2500 vs Celeron N2920

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2790not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronCore Duo
Power efficiency8.08no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$120

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)0 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data90 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1625V - 1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Smart Connect+no data
FSB parityno data-
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency844 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2920 950
+133%
Duo T2500 408

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N2920 1861
+14.8%
Duo T2500 1621

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron N2920 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 342.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2920 and Core Duo T2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2920
Celeron N2920
Intel Core Duo T2500
Core Duo T2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 32 votes

Rate Celeron N2920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 16 votes

Rate Core Duo T2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2920 or Core Duo T2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.