Celeron 1007U vs N2920

Place in the ranking	2809	2867
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	8.11	2.95
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date	1 December 2013 (11 years ago)	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$86

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2920 and Celeron 1007U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	1.86 GHz	1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	2 GHz	1.5 GHz
Bus type	no data	DMI
Bus rate	no data	5 GT/s
Multiplier	no data	15
L1 cache	56K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	256K (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	22 nm
Die size	no data	118 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	105 °C
Number of transistors	no data	1,400 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2920 and Celeron 1007U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)	7.5 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2920 and Celeron 1007U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Flex Memory Access	no data	+
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
Smart Connect	+	no data
FDI	no data	+
Fast Memory Access	no data	+
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2920 and Celeron 1007U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	+	+
Anti-Theft	-	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2920 and Celeron 1007U are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2920 and Celeron 1007U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	8 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HD	-	-
Graphics max frequency	844 MHz	1 GHz
InTru 3D	-	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2920 and Celeron 1007U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	2	3
eDP	no data	+
DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+
SDVO	no data	+
CRT	no data	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2920 and Celeron 1007U.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	4	16
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2920 0.60
+13.2%

Celeron 1007U 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2920 950
+13.1%

Celeron 1007U 840

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N2920 1861
+15.6%

Celeron 1007U 1610

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N2920 1
+18.2%

Celeron 1007U 1

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2920 0.38

Celeron 1007U 0.63
+65.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.60	0.53
Recency	1 December 2013	20 January 2013
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	17 Watt

Celeron N2920 has a 13.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 142.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N2920 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1007U in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2920 and Celeron 1007U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.