Iris Graphics 48 vs Celeron N2840
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2840 and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Iris Graphics |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Gen9 |
Release date | 22 May 2014 (10 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2840 and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
Threads | 2 | no data |
Base clock speed | 2.16 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 0.3 GHz |
L1 cache | 112 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2840 and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2840 and Iris Graphics 48. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2840 and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | no data | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.32 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2840 and Iris Graphics 48.
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Iris Graphics 48 has a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2840 and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2840 and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.