EPYC Embedded 3401 vs Celeron N2840

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3330not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency5.05no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date22 May 2014 (11 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2840 and EPYC Embedded 3401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2.16 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz1.85 GHz
Multiplierno data18.5
L1 cache56K (per core)1536 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9600 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2840 and EPYC Embedded 3401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2840 and EPYC Embedded 3401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2840 and EPYC Embedded 3401 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2840 and EPYC Embedded 3401 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2840 and EPYC Embedded 3401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB1 TiB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2840 and EPYC Embedded 3401 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2840 and EPYC Embedded 3401.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 21 February 2018
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 85 Watt

Celeron N2840 has 1114.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3401, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron N2840 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3401. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2840 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3401 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840
AMD EPYC Embedded 3401
EPYC Embedded 3401

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 772 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate EPYC Embedded 3401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron N2840 and EPYC Embedded 3401, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.