Ultra 9 288V vs Celeron N2830

Place in the ranking	3055	620
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	4.60	38.80
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date	23 February 2014 (10 years ago)	24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2830 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	8
Base clock speed	2.16 GHz	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.41 GHz	5.1 GHz
Bus rate	no data	37 MHz
L1 cache	56K (per core)	192 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	3 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	100 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2830 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)	7.5 Watt	30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2830 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Smart Connect	+	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2830 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2830 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2830 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	Arc 140V
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2830 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2830 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	4	4
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2830 0.34

Ultra 9 288V 12.30
+3518%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2830 548

Ultra 9 288V 19542
+3466%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N2830 1185

Ultra 9 288V 10697
+803%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N2830 2240

Ultra 9 288V 45377
+1926%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N2830 1

Ultra 9 288V 20
+2313%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2830 0.43

Ultra 9 288V 3.56
+728%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.34	12.30
Recency	23 February 2014	24 September 2024
Physical cores	2	8
Threads	2	8
Chip lithography	22 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	30 Watt

Celeron N2830 has 328.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 3517.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2830 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2830 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.