Atom C3308 vs Celeron N2830
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2830 and Atom C3308 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 23 February 2014 (10 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $32 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2830 and Atom C3308 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.16 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 89 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2830 and Atom C3308 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 9.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2830 and Atom C3308. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2830 and Atom C3308 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2830 and Atom C3308. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2830 and Atom C3308.
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 February 2014 | 15 August 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 9 Watt |
Celeron N2830 has 28.6% lower power consumption.
Atom C3308, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2830 and Atom C3308. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron N2830 is a notebook processor while Atom C3308 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2830 and Atom C3308, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
