Xeon E-2336 vs Celeron N2815

Place in the ranking	3089	745
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	3.91	15.10
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date	1 December 2013 (10 years ago)	8 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2815 and Xeon E-2336 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	2	12
Base clock speed	1.86 GHz	2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.13 GHz	4.8 GHz
Bus rate	no data	8 GT/s
L1 cache	112 KB	64K (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB	512K (per core)
L3 cache	1 MB	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	72 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2815 and Xeon E-2336 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)	7.5 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon E-2336. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Smart Connect	+	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2815 and Xeon E-2336 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	no data	+
MPX	-	+
SGX	no data	Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard	no data	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon E-2336 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon E-2336. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3L-1066	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	8 GB	128 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	no data
Graphics max frequency	756 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2815 and Xeon E-2336 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2815 and Xeon E-2336.

PCIe version	2.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	4	44
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2815 0.31

Xeon E-2336 10.37
+3245%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2815 492

Xeon E-2336 16467
+3247%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2815 151

Xeon E-2336 2048
+1256%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2815 251

Xeon E-2336 7454
+2870%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.31	10.37
Recency	1 December 2013	8 September 2021
Physical cores	2	6
Threads	2	12
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	65 Watt

Celeron N2815 has 828.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2336, on the other hand, has a 3245.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E-2336 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2815 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N2815 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2336 is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2815 and Xeon E-2336, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.