Atom x7405C vs Celeron N2810
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2810 and Atom x7405C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Amston Lake |
| Release date | 11 September 2013 (10 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $260 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2810 and Atom x7405C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2810 and Atom x7405C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1170 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2810 and Atom x7405C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2810 and Atom x7405C are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2810 and Atom x7405C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2810 and Atom x7405C.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 September 2013 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 12 Watt |
Celeron N2810 has 71.4% lower power consumption.
Atom x7405C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2810 and Atom x7405C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2810 and Atom x7405C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
