Xeon Gold 6526Y vs Celeron N2808

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.15
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data14.06
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,517

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.58 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB37.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt195 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 GB4 TB
Max memory channels18
Maximum memory bandwidth10.66 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes480
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2808 510
Xeon Gold 6526Y 46025
+8925%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 195 Watt

Celeron N2808 has 4775% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6526Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2808 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6526Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Xeon Gold 6526Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y
Xeon Gold 6526Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6526Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2808 or Xeon Gold 6526Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.