EPYC 9845 vs Celeron N2808

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3082not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency7.57no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Turin (2024)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$13,564

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)160
Threads2320
Base clock speed1.58 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170SP5
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth10.66 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4128
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 160
Threads 2 320
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 390 Watt

Celeron N2808 has 9650% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 7900% more physical cores and 15900% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2808 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9845 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2808 or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.