Ultra 5 238V vs Celeron N2808

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2808
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.32
Core Ultra 5 238V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
14.03
+4284%

Core Ultra 5 238V outperforms Celeron N2808 by a whopping 4284% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3098525
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency7.5778.10
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads28
Base clock speed1.58 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Connect+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size4 GB32 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth10.66 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel Arc Graphics 130V
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency792 MHz1.85 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes44
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 14.03
Integrated graphics card 0.77 11.64
Recency 22 May 2014 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron N2808 has 325% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 238V, on the other hand, has a 4284.4% higher aggregate performance score, 1411.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 238V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2808 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Core Ultra 5 238V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V
Core Ultra 5 238V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 238V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2808 or Core Ultra 5 238V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.