Xeon w7-3565X vs Celeron N2807

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated36
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.79
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data13.63
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$2,689

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.58 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB82.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt335 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 GB4 TB
Max memory channels18
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4112
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2807 486
Xeon w7-3565X 76649
+15671%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2014 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 335 Watt

Celeron N2807 has 8275% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3565X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2807 is a notebook processor while Xeon w7-3565X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2807 and Xeon w7-3565X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2807
Celeron N2807
Intel Xeon w7-3565X
Xeon w7-3565X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 35 votes

Rate Celeron N2807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3565X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2807 or Xeon w7-3565X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.