Atom Z625 vs Celeron N2805

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.46 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno datacDMI
Bus rateno data400 MT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache56K (per core)56 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data65.2526 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C+90 °C
Number of transistorsno data140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170T-PBGA518
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt2.2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
GPIOno data+
Smart Connect+no data
FDIno data-
Fast Memory Accessno data-
AMTno data-
Matrix Storageno data-
Quiet Systemno data-
I/O Accelerationno data-
Quick Resumeno data-
HD Audiono data-
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size4 GB2 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesPowerVR SGX535
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
LVDSno data+
MIPIno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625.

PCIe version2.0-
PCI Express lanes4no data
PCI supportno data-
USB revision3.0 and 2.02.0
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Integrated IDEno data-
Number of USB ports54
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2013 4 May 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 2 Watt

Celeron N2805 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z625, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2805 and Atom Z625, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805
Intel Atom Z625
Atom Z625

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 98 votes

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom Z625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2805 or Atom Z625, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.