Atom N450 vs Celeron N2805

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2805
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.21
+61.5%
Atom N450
2009
1 core / 2 threads, 5 Watt
0.13

Celeron N2805 outperforms Atom N450 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2805 and Atom N450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32153349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency4.972.05
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)21 December 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$64

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2805 and Atom N450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.46 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)56 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2805 and Atom N450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom N450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2805 and Atom N450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom N450 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom N450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size4 GB2 GB
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2805 and Atom N450 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2805 and Atom N450.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2805 0.21
+61.5%
Atom N450 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2805 335
+65%
Atom N450 203

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N2805 756
+35%
Atom N450 560

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N2805 1430
+65.3%
Atom N450 865

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N2805 885
+79.1%
Atom N450 494

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N2805 85.2
+37.3%
Atom N450 117

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.13
Recency 11 September 2013 21 December 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 5 Watt

Celeron N2805 has a 61.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N2805 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2805 and Atom N450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805
Intel Atom N450
Atom N450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 101 vote

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 182 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2805 or Atom N450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.