i9-13900HK vs Celeron M U3400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M U3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.29
Core i9-13900HK
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
19.60
+6659%

Core i9-13900HK outperforms Celeron M U3400 by a whopping 6659% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3123289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAlder Lake-P
Power efficiency1.5341.46
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$697

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads220
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81+114 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1288FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory sizeno data96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 19.60
Recency 24 May 2010 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 20
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron M U3400 has 150% lower power consumption.

i9-13900HK, on the other hand, has a 6658.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 600% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

The Core i9-13900HK is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Core i9-13900HK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400
Intel Core i9-13900HK
Core i9-13900HK

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 65 votes

Rate Core i9-13900HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M U3400 or Core i9-13900HK, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.