Pentium E5300 vs Celeron M P4600
Aggregate performance score
Pentium E5300 outperforms Celeron M P4600 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Pentium E5300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2800 | 2794 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.04 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.51 | 0.83 |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (14 years ago) | November 2008 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $64 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4600 and Pentium E5300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 228 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4600 and Pentium E5300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Pentium E5300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4600 and Pentium E5300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Pentium E5300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and Pentium E5300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.58 | 0.59 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M P4600 has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
Pentium E5300, on the other hand, has a 1.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron M P4600 and Pentium E5300.
Be aware that Celeron M P4600 is a notebook processor while Pentium E5300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Pentium E5300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
