Opteron X2 875 vs Celeron M P4600
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2842 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.50 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Egypt (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (14 years ago) | September 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 233 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 |
| Socket | PGA988 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron M P4600 has a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M P4600 is a notebook processor while Opteron X2 875 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
