i5-13600K vs Celeron M P4600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.57
Core i5-13600K
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
24.32
+4167%

Core i5-13600K outperforms Celeron M P4600 by a whopping 4167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2822210
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.58
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Core i5
Power efficiency1.5112.48
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$319

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache128 KB768 KB
L2 cache512 KB8 MB
L3 cache2 MB24 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81+114 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA988FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 W, 181 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M P4600 0.57
i5-13600K 24.32
+4167%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M P4600 1886
i5-13600K 10755
+470%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M P4600 4213
i5-13600K 68880
+1535%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M P4600 1804
i5-13600K 17627
+877%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M P4600 34.29
i5-13600K 2.52
+1261%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron M P4600 1
i5-13600K 42
+3230%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 24.32
Recency 1 October 2010 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 20
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron M P4600 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

i5-13600K, on the other hand, has a 4166.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 600% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

The Core i5-13600K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M P4600 is a notebook processor while Core i5-13600K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Core i5-13600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
Intel Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2041 vote

Rate Core i5-13600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or Core i5-13600K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.