Ryzen 7 5800X vs Celeron M 925

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated354
Place by popularitynot in top-10060
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.48
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data15.81
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Release date1 January 2011 (13 years ago)8 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data38
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data32 MB
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size107 mm22 x 80.7 sq. mm; I/O = 125 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2011 8 October 2020
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 105 Watt

Celeron M 925 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 5800X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 925 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 5800X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5812 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 925 or Ryzen 7 5800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.