Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Celeron M 925
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 1 January 2011 (13 years ago) | August 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128K |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | no data |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA478 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 81 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 81 Watt |
Celeron M 925 has 131.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
