i7-620UE vs Celeron M 925
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | $248 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.07 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 1.0 |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 1 × 2.5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 8 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 382 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PGA478 | Intel BGA 1288 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 12.799 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Celeron M 925 has an age advantage of 11 months.
i7-620UE, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 925 and Core i7-620UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
