Celeron SU2300 vs M 743
Aggregate performance score
Celeron SU2300 outperforms Celeron M 743 by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 743 and Celeron SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3322 | 3127 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.43 | 2.76 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | no data |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and Celeron SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and Celeron SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA965 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and Celeron SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 743 and Celeron SU2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 743 and Celeron SU2300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.29 |
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 1 July 2009 |
Celeron M 743 has an age advantage of 2 months.
Celeron SU2300, on the other hand, has a 93.3% higher aggregate performance score.
The Celeron SU2300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and Celeron SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
