Athlon 64 LE-1660 vs Celeron M 630 MHz
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 630 MHz and Athlon 64 LE-1660 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Lima (2008−2009) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 630 MHz and Athlon 64 LE-1660 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.63 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 77 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 122 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 630 MHz and Athlon 64 LE-1660 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron M 630 MHz has 800% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 LE-1660, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 630 MHz and Athlon 64 LE-1660. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 630 MHz is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 LE-1660 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 630 MHz and Athlon 64 LE-1660, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
